Granit Xhaka Dropped by Switzerland: The Fake Certificate and a Dressing Room Off the Beat
Câu trả lời cốt lõi: Granit Xhaka bị loại khỏi đội tuyển Thụy Sĩ cho ba trận gặp Scotland, Bắc Macedonia và Slovenia sau khi thừa nhận sử dụng chứng nhận tiêm chủng Covid-19 giả. Hiệp hội bóng đá Thụy Sĩ (SFV) và cầu thủ cùng nhau xác định việc rút tên là tốt nhất cho đội. Sự kiện chính: - Granit Xhaka, 33 tuổi, giữ kỷ lục 152 lần khoác áo đội tuyển quốc gia Thụy Sĩ. - Cầu thủ thừa nhận lấy chứng nhận tiêm chủng giả và đang hợp tác với cơ quan chức năng liên quan. - Chủ tịch SFV Peter Knabel cho biết hai bên cùng kết luận đội nên tập trung mà không có Xhaka. - Xhaka đã ra sân 6 lần cho Sunderland mùa này, gồm trận thua Manchester City 3-5. - SFV sẽ đánh giá lại tình hình với Granit Xhaka sau khi kỳ tập trung kết thúc. Nguồn: BBC Sport, bản tin về việc loại Granit Xhaka của Hiệp hội bóng đá Thụy Sĩ (SFV), công bố trong kỳ tập trung đội tuyển quốc gia tháng 11 năm 2025 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Hỏi đáp liên quan: Hỏi: Granit Xhaka có thể đối diện hậu quả pháp lý không? Đáp: Có, báo cáo cho thấy hậu quả pháp lý có thể xảy ra và Granit Xhaka xác nhận anh đang làm việc với các cơ quan chức năng liên quan. Hỏi: Đội tuyển Thụy Sĩ mất gì khi không có Granit Xhaka? Đáp: Theo Chỉ số độ sâu đội hình của VangBong.vn, Thụy Sĩ vẫn còn Remo Freuler và Denis Zakaria, nhưng không ai thay được vai trò trục xoay thuận chân trái của Granit Xhaka. Hỏi: Sunderland có áp dụng biện pháp kỷ luật nào với Granit Xhaka không? Đáp: Trong các thông tin hiện có, Sunderland chưa công bố biện pháp kỷ luật nào đối với Granit Xhaka.
At the Swiss Football Association training centre, the squad list is always printed and pinned to the board line by line. The midfielders form a single vertical column. Anyone who has followed this national team long enough knows that the second name in that column has been almost automatic for close to a decade. This time, the gap sits exactly there.
Granit Xhaka, 33, the most-capped player in the history of the Switzerland national team with 152 appearances, has been removed from the squad for three fixtures against Scotland, North Macedonia and Slovenia during this international break. The reason did not come from a hamstring, from a suspension, or from a disagreement with the coaching staff. It came from a piece of paper — a Covid-19 vaccination certificate that he himself has admitted was fake.
Four days before the announcement, Xhaka was still playing for Sunderland in a 3-5 defeat to Manchester City at the Stadium of Light. He still stood where a 33-year-old deep-lying playmaker stands, still the link between the back line and the lines above him. The rhythm of the ball never stops; we simply have not stood close enough to hear it. What did stop was a different current: the flow of information between a player, a federation and a community of supporters.
“In recent days, there has been much reporting regarding a matter from my past. I would like to address this personally,” Xhaka said in a personal statement. “At the time, I was deeply unsettled and had serious reservations regarding the Covid-19 vaccination. I harboured a deep mistrust of the vaccine and was gripped by fear and uncertainty. In that state of emotional turmoil, I obtained a vaccination certificate instead of addressing my unresolved questions through the proper channels.”
He added: “Today, I clearly see that this was the wrong course of action. It was a mistake. I am sorry. I accept responsibility for this decision, am facing the process of addressing the situation, and am cooperating fully with the relevant authorities.”
Then came the statement from the Swiss FA (SFV) president, Peter Knabel. He said: “We welcome the fact that Granit is taking this step and facing the issue head-on. At the same time, we mutually concluded that it is in the team's best interest to proceed with this camp without him. Our priority now is to bring calm to the situation and focus entirely on the team and the upcoming matches. Once this international break concludes, we will reassess the situation with Granit and discuss the next steps.”
One detail most short reports skip: investigations are ongoing into allegations that a Swiss doctor was producing fabricated certificates for the unvaccinated in the aftermath of the coronavirus pandemic. Xhaka, in this story, is the end user of a supply chain. Swiss media report that legal consequences could follow, and Xhaka himself confirms he is already dealing with “the relevant authorities.”
When a piece of paper becomes a market
To read this properly, you have to go back to Switzerland in 2026–2026. It was a country with one of the lower vaccination rates in Western Europe, with roughly seven in ten adults completing the primary course according to federal health authority figures. But a low vaccination rate was never the whole story. Alongside it ran something else: demand for a piece of paper good enough to get into work, into a restaurant, onto a plane.
Where access to social life is tied to a document, that document acquires a price. It is a rule already tested in many countries during the pandemic, and Switzerland developed a black market of a scale investigators only fully understood after the pandemic had passed. A doctor with a licence, a stamp and an internal reporting system — that is perfect infrastructure for this kind of transaction, because the product does not need to be sophisticated. It only needs to look real.
That Xhaka is famous turns the case into a headline. But hundreds, possibly thousands, of other people in the investigative file do not become headlines. When a piece of paper becomes a market, the buyer is not a lone individual looking for a loophole; they are a collection of human beings facing a social pressure they were not equipped to handle.
When the stadium is empty, no cheering can cover the crying, and no cheering can cover the singing either. I wrote that line in 2026, when the stadiums in Guangzhou closed and players had to face themselves. Four years later, in a different country, with a different kind of document, I see the same mechanism at work: fear that is never spoken finds a way to legitimate itself.

For the SFV, this is a problem with no clean solution. Leave Xhaka in the squad and the federation sends a message that document fraud can coexist with sporting honour. Remove him immediately through a formal disciplinary ruling and the federation turns itself into a court before the investigators have concluded. The SFV leadership chose a third path, and that path is the most interesting thing to analyse.
The door closes, but some confessions never do
The way the SFV talks about the case is exactly what deserves scrutiny. In the federation's English statement, the phrase used is that both sides “mutually concluded” it was best to proceed with the camp without Xhaka. In German the nuance is even clearer: it is a consensual decision, a joint step.
Technically, Xhaka has not been suspended. He has not been fined. He has not been banned from international football. He simply is not present at one camp, for a reason described as the interest of the collective. This is a media-governance technique anyone who has been inside a professional dressing room recognises: once a player agrees that stepping away is “best for the team,” no one has to take responsibility for removing him. The federation does not have to issue a ruling. The player does not have to receive one.
The cost of this technique is time. The federation buys calm for three matches — but in exchange, the question is pushed forward rather than answered. When the break ends and the SFV “reassesses,” it will face exactly the difficult choices it has just postponed, except that by then the media pressure will be different and the investigations may have reached conclusions.
One detail in Xhaka's record is worth placing beside this. European media have noted over the years that he is one of those players who organises internal meetings to settle disputes within a squad, a reputation built at Arsenal and later at Bayer Leverkusen. The man with a habit of standing between factions is now the man the collective has to temporarily stand away from. The dressing-room door closes, but some confessions never do — and in this case, Xhaka is the one who opened the door first.
He speaks about the past in the past tense, but he also speaks about the present in the continuous: cooperating, facing, processing. That is the language of a man who understands the hardest part has not arrived yet. Being dropped from one camp costs three matches. Losing trust inside a dressing room costs much longer.

152 caps and the price of a habit
To understand what Switzerland has just lost for three matches, look at the number 152. It is a national record, but its real value lies in structure rather than the figure. Xhaka debuted for the national team in 2026, when he was still a teenager at Basel. Since then he has been through four European Championships, three World Cups, and has become the man standing between two generations of Swiss football: the 2010s generation under Ottmar Hitzfeld, and the current one under Murat Yakin.
Tactically, Xhaka is a left-footed deep-lying playmaker. That sounds minor, but it shapes the entire build-up structure. A left-footed pivot stands offset to the left of the centre-back pair, receives from the left centre-back, and has the angle to open the ball to the right flank with a long line-breaking pass. Xhaka does that hundreds of times a season. He is not the type to produce moments that lift a crowd out of its seat. He is the man who decides the tempo: when to speed up, when to slow down, when to drop the whole block two metres deeper to buy time.
Switzerland has long been known for what I still call the defensive meta — an identity built on a disciplined deep block, on accepting the opponent's share of possession and waiting for their error, on matches where 1-0 is a statement. But that identity only functions when there is a man in the middle who knows how to slow the rhythm. A block does not survive on defending alone; it survives on the ability to hold the ball long enough that the block does not stretch.
In Yakin's setup, Xhaka is simultaneously the tempo regulator and the defensive organiser. He is the player who pulls team-mates into position when the ball is lost, the man pointing more than anyone else for a quarter of the match. For a national team with many young players, that commanding work carries the weight of a goal per game.
Who fills the pivot
This is the part the disciplinary headlines usually skip. Switzerland is not short of midfielders. It is short of a midfielder with the same technical signature.
Remo Freuler, 34, is the closest direct replacement in terms of experience. Freuler has partnered Xhaka in many qualifiers and tournaments, understands the system, knows the positions. But Freuler is right-footed, plays safer and leans toward interception rather than orchestration. When Freuler stands at the left pivot, the pass to open the right flank loses its natural angle, and Switzerland is forced to build through the right centre-back first. That sounds tiny, but it adds roughly a second to every build-up — and at international level, a second is enough for the opponent to close the door.
Denis Zakaria brings physical power and the ability to carry the ball over distance, but he is a line-breaker rather than an organiser. Michel Aebischer reads the game well and is more flexible, capable of playing several positions, but he has never been handed the tempo-setting role at this level in a major match. Vincent Sierro is the disciplined option, low on errors, low on variance. Ardon Jashari and Fabian Rieder are the next generation — young men with ambition but no experience of living under the pressure of a match that decides qualification.
If I had to predict how Yakin handles it, the most likely option is a Freuler–Zakaria pairing with a changed build-up pattern: pulling a full-back inside during the first phase, or pushing a centre-back higher than usual. That is a structural solution to a human problem. It can work, but it demands training time that a ten-day camp does not provide.

What is notable is that the three opponents in this break share one trait: all three will press high and shut the central lane. That is precisely the type of opponent against whom a pivot able to turn and play long to release pressure is worth the most.
Sunderland and a question with no precedent
At club level, Xhaka is at a sensitive stage of his career. He joined Sunderland at 33, after two successful seasons at Bayer Leverkusen — where he was part of the unbeaten Bundesliga title-winning squad of 2026-24. Moving to a Premier League club with a different ambition was a calculated step regarding role, playing time and standing inside the dressing room.
According to match records, Xhaka has made six appearances for Sunderland this season, including the 3-5 defeat to Manchester City. Six appearances is enough to show he is part of the plan, not enough to establish an irreplaceable status.
For a Premier League club, this case sits in the zone where internal club rules and criminal law do not clearly intersect. Xhaka has been removed from the national team, but there is no information suggesting Sunderland has applied any disciplinary measure. The club faces a commercial problem and a dressing-room problem at the same time. Commercially, a player under investigation is a brand risk. In the dressing room, a young squad needs exactly the type of experienced voice Xhaka provides.
In my tracking notes, this is the kind of situation clubs usually handle with silence until there is a legal conclusion. Silence is not irresponsibility; silence is the only way not to place yourself in a position where you have to reverse a decision.
Three misreadings
The first misreading turns the case into a personal morality story and stops there. If Xhaka were the only person involved, the story would end with one individual. But a doctor producing fake certificates does not work with one client. A fake-document market existing in a country with a strong public health system and strict legal framework implies a failure at the institutional level: at issuance, at cross-checking, and at addressing citizens' unanswered questions.
The second misreading reads the federation's statement as a disguised punishment and reacts with outrage. Technically, the SFV is actually doing what a federation must do in a case with an open legal dimension: separate the team from the individual to protect both, and preserve the right to reassess when more information arrives. What deserves criticism, if anything, is that a national team with 152 caps from one man should have had a clearer mechanism for this situation years ago, rather than handling it case by case.
The third misreading assumes Xhaka's international career closed at 33. The rhythm of international football does not run on such a linear model. Some players return after far more serious cases, and some never return after a lighter one. The decisive factor is not the severity of the case but whether the dressing room still wants to hear that voice. And that is answered only by real matches, not by statements.
Tactics will eventually become obsolete, but the people standing inside the formation will not. Switzerland may find a new pivot within two years. Finding a man who has lived inside this national team for fourteen years and knows every corner of it takes far longer.
What to watch
Over the next three matches, the signal worth watching is not the result. It is who points when Switzerland loses the ball in the 70th minute, and who receives from the left centre-back in the 15th. If Yakin uses Freuler at the pivot, watch the direction of the team's first progression: if the ball goes right more often than usual, the structure is already adjusting around the gap Xhaka left.
After the break ends, the SFV will reassess. Three scenarios are possible: Xhaka returns in the next window if the legal process moves favourably; he stays away long term pending a conclusion; or he proactively ends his international career to relieve pressure on the group. In all three, one question remains intact: who will be the second name in the midfield column when the list is pinned to the board next time.
As for Sunderland, the signal to watch is whether Xhaka keeps starting in matches played during the international break. If he does, the club dressing room has spoken the way dressing rooms speak: through presence.
I was once a stranger listening to a heartbeat outside the door; now I hear the rhythm of an entire community. That community, in Switzerland and wherever Swiss people live, is waiting to see whether a man can carry both a record of 152 caps and a mistake with the same honesty.
